Audit and the third sector: Making connections on health and social care integration

Given the high profile nature of Audit Scotland’s work, it’s not unusual to be invited to address stakeholders at an event. So I’ll admit that I was nervous in accepting Voluntary Health Scotland’s invitation to speak at two workshops on our recent update on the progress of health and social care integration.

After all, integration is one of the most ambitious public sector reforms in recent memory, involving at least £8 billion of public money, millions of service users, 31 new integration authorities, and a potentially overwhelming number of lines of accountability.

And, some conferences or seminars can feel like the audience are there reluctantly. But these folk had volunteered to be there. What would be their expectations of audit? Would I live up to them? What hard-hitting questions could I expect?

ishare_graphic_template2Even more worryingly the first event, in Edinburgh, was captured live on Twitter, with comments and questions coming thick and fast via @VHScotlandComms and @AuditScotland using #healthandsocialcare. As a newcomer to the world of social media, I had imagined  the whole of Western civilisation putting its feet up for half an hour to listen out for any howlers.

Fortunately I had my colleague Rebecca Smallwood, who also worked on the health and social care integration report, alongside to help out if I lost my head (possibly by just sticking it back on and hoping for the best).

There was a lot of interest, with a number of individuals and groups from the third sector coming along: everyone in the room was keen to know more about how we’d approached our work on health and social care integration. There were a lot of questions and comments about where we might go next. Fortunately they were quite charitable. I think everyone recognised the risks highlighted in our report: complex governance arrangements, difficulties in agreeing budgets, and uncertainty about how services will be redesigned. If I had to sum up the mood, I’d probably go with ‘optimistic scepticism’.

It was much the same at our second event in Glasgow this week, and both experiences were very valuable for Rebecca and me.

How Audit Scotland engages with others, such as the voluntary sector and service users, is something we’re considering carefully at the moment, and it was refreshing and insightful to gain some alternative perspectives on what our role and focus should be in the months ahead.

So everything worked out in the end, and Voluntary Health Scotland kindly pulled together key messages and information from the events, available here. But there was a downside… I’ve now been asked to speak to another two meetings!

About the author

MM6A6250Gordon Neill, senior manager, has worked on a range of audits, particularly Best Value, over his 12 year career with Audit Scotland. He recently led on the first audit in our new series on health and social care integration.

Playing our part in the changing landscape of Scotland’s public finances

There’s no doubt that this is a busy and exciting time for anyone with an interest in Scotland’s political and financial landscape. Generating a lot of discussion is the Scotland Bill 2015, set to grant further financial powers to the Scottish Parliament and establish a new fiscal framework which could substantially revise its budgetary and funding arrangements. All of this is taking place while new financial powers in the Scotland Act 2012 are being implemented.

A number of Scottish and UK parliamentary committees have taken an interest in the development of new financial powers. Audit Scotland also has key role to play in this fast changing area of public finances, and we’ve been one of many public bodies asked to give views to Parliament on this important area.

We set out initial views on the audit arrangements for any new financial powers in a submission to the Public Audit Committee in August 2015, and I gave evidence on behalf of Audit Scotland to the Finance Committee’s inquiry on the Scottish Fiscal Commission Bill. The Commission plays a vital scrutiny role by providing independent assessments of forecasts of tax revenues, and its remit is likely to grow with further financial devolution.

We’ve also looked closely at how implementation of the Scotland Act 2012 has been prepared for, and managed; we first reported on progress in December 2014, and we’ve recently published a follow-up to this work, available here.

Our latest update explained how Revenue Scotland – the body responsible for the administration of the newly devolved Land and Buildings Transaction Tax and the Scottish Landfill Tax – effectively managed risks to make sure they were delivered successfully from April last year. In short, a good news story, though there’s still a lot of work ahead.

We also reported that some arrangements to manage the powers in the Act (and potentially the Scotland Bill 2015) beyond this year are still being developed, which is reasonable. However, we’ve highlighted the need for the Scottish Government to be able to move quickly once key agreements are reached, so it can be in a position to manage the new powers well and deliver financial reporting that’s comprehensive, transparent, reliable and timely.

On Wednesday (27 January), I’ll join the Auditor General and colleagues to discuss our findings with MSPs on the Scottish Parliament’s Public Audit Committee. The session will be broadcast live on Parliament TV.

MSPs will also hear from the Auditor General on other interesting new work which has seen Audit Scotland provide assurance to Parliament on an audit of the Scottish Rate of Income Tax (SRIT). We reviewed the National Audit Office’s first annual audit of HMRC’s implementation of the SRIT, which comes into force in April 2016. The Auditor General will report annually to the audit committee on the NAO’s work in this area, and it’s provided a great opportunity for us to work with another UK audit body.

Public audit provides assurance that public money is well managed. This is important for the public and decision-makers, and will become even more relevant as Scotland takes on further financial powers. For Audit Scotland, it means that the scope of our work will likely become more wide-ranging and diverse.

About the author

MarkTaylor Mark Taylor is an Assistant Director in Audit Scotland. He oversees a wide portfolio of central government audits, including the Scottish Government audit.

Monitoring the progress of health and social care integration

Big changes are bringing together health and social care services in Scotland.

Traditionally, the NHS has provided health services and councils have provided social care. The new reforms will see these services planned and resourced by one local organisation, intended to create a seamless system which gives people the care they need, at the right time and place.

All adult social care and some health services including GPs, community healthcare, and certain hospital services (those which are mainly unplanned, such as A&E) are covered by the reforms. This makes the potential impact of integration wide reaching, as it involves services relied on by many. And as a country, we’re getting older, which means it’s likely the number of people needing health and social care services will increase in the years to come.

H&SCI_CoverIn early December, we published the first in a series of audits that we’ll undertake to monitor progress with the reforms. We found that the new arrangements are likely to be in place across Scotland by April 2016, but there’s more work to do to ensure that people using services feel the benefit of the changes.

We also found some evidence to suggest that local areas might not be in a position to make a huge difference in 2016/17. There are difficulties agreeing how much money councils and NHS boards will bring together to provide integrated services.  This, combined with uncertainty about much funding will be available in the longer term, means some local areas don’t have clear plans for how and when services will change.

If integration is going to make a real difference to people who use health and social care services, it’s important that all local areas make detailed plans for how they’ll make the necessary changes. It’s also important to be clear how they will measure the impact of these changes.

We found other issues that need resolved if the reforms are to be successful. For example, the new system is complicated, and it’ll be important that each local area makes clear, to both staff and the public, who is responsible for the health and social care provided.

There are also issues relating to available staff in health and social care. These include considering how this workforce can best contribute to changes to the services provided and how to recruit people into jobs where there are shortages of suitably skilled staff.

Like the different bodies involved in integration, Audit Scotland recognises the importance of getting this right and the consequences if that doesn’t happen, and we’ve made detailed recommendations to support improvement in our report to the Accounts Commission and the Auditor General. We’ll begin the next audit looking at the further progress of integration in early 2017.

In the meantime, we’re discussing our findings and recommendations with members of the Scottish Parliament’s Public Audit Committee on Wednesday (13 January). You can view the agenda, and watch the meeting live, via the Parliament’s website.

About the author

MM6A5569Rebecca Smallwood is an auditor and joined Audit Scotland in 2008.  She has worked on a number of audits with a health and social care focus, including community health partnerships, emergency departments and reshaping care for older people.

Supporting Scotland’s economic growth – new audit invites businesses to share views

Supporting-Scotland_Eco_development_businessconsultation_banner

I’ve recently starting working on an audit with a few colleagues in Audit Scotland looking at the roles and impact of Scotland’s economic development agencies, Scottish Enterprise (SE) and Highlands and Islands Enterprise (HIE).

These agencies have a specific remit to generate economic growth across Scotland. They spend around £380 million a year supporting Scotland’s businesses and industry sectors. Our work will provide an independent assessment of what this money is spent on, and what it achieves. You can find out more about how we’re carrying out this work in our project flyer.

Since beginning the audit we have spoken to a few businesses and business representative groups who’ve received some form of support from the agencies. This has helped us gather insight into how SE and HIE operate and support economic growth in Scotland.

That work is ongoing, and we’re now inviting businesses to get in touch to share views and experiences with us.

We’d welcome responses from businesses who’ve received any form of support from SE and HIE. We’d like to hear from you on what went well, what could have gone better, and what benefits you and your business gained from the experience.

We also want to hear from you if your business was unable to access support from SE or HIE. What were the reasons for this, and were these reasons clearly explained to you?

We won’t publish individual responses, but will use the information we receive to help build a fuller picture of how economic development is progressing in Scotland, and to help compile our findings.

Our report, which we plan to publish in summer 2016, will highlight good practice and make relevant recommendations to help improve public sector economic development activity.

If you’d like to participate or have any queries, please get in touch by 5pm on Friday, December 11th 2015 by emailing me at gdiamond@audit-scotland.gov.uk or by telephoning 0131 625 1820. You can also write to the audit team at 102 West Port, Edinburgh, EH3 9DN.

About the author

gdiamondGemma Diamond, senior manager, has worked on a wide range of audits across the public sector since joining Audit Scotland in 2010. She currently leads Audit Scotland’s economic development portfolio.

Supporting administrative justice in Scotland’s councils

For the past year, I’ve been helping the Scottish Tribunals and Administrative Justice Advisory Committee (STAJAC) produce a report looking at administrative justice in councils.

What’s that about, you may ask? It might sound a bit like a plot from Yes Minister (no, that was the Department of Administrative Affairs) but in fact, it’s more important (and complex) than you might think. It’s about the part of the justice system concerned with decision-making by public bodies that affect your rights and interests.

In Scotland, councils make most administrative justice decisions, examples include school placement requests, planning permission, parking and bus lane enforcement and over 40 kinds of licencing from alcohol and gambling to pedicabs and rickshaws.

For the complete unexpurgated list, you can view the newly launched report Making decisions fairly – Developing excellence in administrative justice in Scottish councils. The project looked at a representative selection of local authority decision-making areas to model the user journey through these administrative justice processes. It provides a whole system view of the decision making areas, including the appeal or review processes and attaches indicative costs to each part of the process.

The report – one of two launched this week by STAJAC to showcase the administrative justice landscape in Scotland – also aims to raise awareness of the importance of sound and transparent administrative justice decision making, in particular by local authorities.

Having effective decision-making, complaints, and appeals processes is also important for councils’ reputations and can help them improve services and, most importantly, people’s experience of those services. We also found that empowering frontline staff to vary decisions or find alternative solutions for service users could reduce appeals and complaints and achieve moderate savings.

Administrative justice is also a crucially important for how we in Audit Scotland carry out our work, as looking at services from the viewpoint of the user provides us with a fresh and valuable perspective. For example, a service user trying to negotiate through paperwork and online forms to gain access to services or get permissions and licences will have had a unique experience of the decision making processes within a council.

As part of our forthcoming audit on social work services in Scotland, we’ll be looking at the views of service users and carers on the support they receive from councils and others.

About the author

MM6A5530John Lincoln is an audit manager within Audit Scotland’s Performance Audit and Best Value team. His next project will be leading on an audit of social work services in Scotland, which is expected to report in Summer 2016.

Action must be taken now if the NHS as we know it is to continue

The National Health Service is one of our most valued public services – one we all rely on at some stage in our lives, whether that’s as a patient, a carer, a family member or AS_Twitter_COVERfriend. So how is the NHS in Scotland performing and what lies ahead in its future?

Almost 140,000 NHS staff provide a variety of high-quality services, support and advice in hospitals, GP and dental surgeries, community facilities and patients’ homes in Scotland. The level and quality of care provided has contributed to people living longer, alongside continued advances in diagnosis, treatment and care.

Although Scotland’s population is living longer, demand for healthcare is increasing as older people are more likely to have complex health and care needs. In recent years, the cost of delivering health services has increased significantly, coinciding with a period of constrained public finances. In 2014/15, spending by health boards was £11.4 billion – around a third of Scotland’s total budget.

Last week we published our annual overview report on the NHS in Scotland, which looks at the performance of health boards and comments on the many challenges and pressures facing the NHS. It also looks ahead to assess what progress the Scottish Government is making towards achieving their 2020 vision which aims to enable everyone to live longer, healthier lives at home or in a homely setting by 2020.

It will come as no surprise to many people that the NHS continues to experience significant pressures such as tighter budgets, rising costs, tougher performance targets and greater demands on its services. Our report highlights that, overall, boards managed their finances well given the size of the budget and the scale of pressures faced. However, we found that performance against many of its key waiting time targets has deteriorated in recent years. Similarly, recruiting and retaining medical professionals is one of the biggest challenges facing health boards today, leading to more money being spent using temporary staff to help keep services running. Getting the right skills in the right place, on a permanent basis, is essential to ensuring an effective health service. We also found that the Scottish Government has not made sufficient progress towards achieving its 2020 vision. Our report says that they need to step up the pace of change and make fundamental changes now if it is to achieve its longer-term ambitions.

It’s clear that these pressures and challenges are going to be felt for a number of years to come. This means it’s more important than ever that the Scottish Government and health boards demonstrate value for money in their spending. It’s also why healthcare will continue to be a key focus of our audit work. In the coming months for example, we’ll be publishing the first of a series of reports looking at the new arrangements for Health and Social Care Integration as well as publishing our findings from work looking at changing models of health and social care in Scotland.

About the author

Michael_OliphantMichael Oliphant, Audit Manager, led the ‘NHS in Scotland 2015’ report team. He joined Audit Scotland in 2004 and has since managed a number of national performance audits looking at different areas of the public sector, including the Commonwealth Games, police reform, major capital investment and Scotland’s public finances.

Auditing complex community-based projects

Big noise logoAs we move into increasingly uncharted territory of more preventative, place-based public service delivery, reflecting the post-Christie agenda, there’s a growing need for audit and inspection to adapt. This will help us to better understand what difference public services (and their third and private sector partners) are making in giving Scotland’s communities the opportunity to fulfil their full potential.

For example, my Audit Scotland colleague Aileen Campbell recently finished an 18-month secondment with the Glasgow Centre for Population Health (GCPH) on a project to evaluate Sistema Scotland’s Big Noise programme in the Raploch area of Stirling and the Govanhill neighbourhood in Glasgow. This was an innovative piece of work, which Aileen has previously blogged about. Continue reading Auditing complex community-based projects

Auditing Best Value in Falkirk Council

AS_Twitter_Exhibit_COVERI was part of the team which carried out the audit of Best Value in Falkirk Council on behalf of the  Accounts Commission, the public spending watchdog for local government.

Our extensive audit work included interviewing councillors and senior officers. We held focus groups with councillors so they all had an opportunity to contribute their views on what was happening. Staff were also invited to take part in a focus group to help us understand how certain issues  affected their work, and how services were being delivered to the people of Falkirk. Continue reading Auditing Best Value in Falkirk Council

Exploring higher education…

College_jotter_smScotland has 19 higher education institutions, ranging from ancient universities like St Andrews to those established in the last 25 years. Some have a very specific focus, such as the Royal Conservatoire of Scotland. What they all have in common is providing a massive range of opportunities for learning and research.

I’m currently working with a small team on an audit of higher education in Scotland. Although we did an audit of estates management in higher education in 2007, taking a broader overview of the higher education is an interesting new area for Audit Scotland. Continue reading Exploring higher education…

What needs to be at the heart of community planning?

community_planning_cover Last month, colleagues and I headed to Glasgow to join 300 delegates from across Scotland at a national conference on community planning Changing Lives, Delivering Success: Turning Ambition into Action.

In the report we published last year, Community Planning: turning ambition into action, we found that there is a renewed energy around community planning since the publication of the Statement of Ambition, and the buzzing atmosphere on the day certainly reflected that. Continue reading What needs to be at the heart of community planning?